nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering)
From: vijay gill <vgill () vijaygill com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:13:18 -0400
Richard Irving wrote:
vijay gill wrote:"There can only be *one* !" - WorldCom chant, Circa 1995. WorldCom didn't know what IP SFI was in 95. Perhaps you mean UUNET/MFS?Or, perhaps I mean Alternet, eh ?
Perhaps this is a rolex on my wrist, but they seemed to have made a typo. They misspelled Rolex as timex?
Service vs company might be useful distinctions. /vijay
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering, (continued)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Micheal Patterson (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard Irving (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) vijay gill (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) vijay gill (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Dorian Kim (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) vijay gill (Oct 05)
- RE: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Sean Butler (Oct 05)
- Re: Peering vs SFI (was Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Richard Irving (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Justin M. Streiner (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Senie (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jeff Shultz (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering James (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jeff Shultz (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Joe Abley (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Joe Abley (Oct 05)