nanog mailing list archives

Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation)


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:04:26 -0700

I believe RFC1122 was written in the days when there was a one-to-one
correlation
between IP addresses and interfaces, and, you couldn't have one machine with
multiple addresses on the same network.  Obviously, also, we are talking
about
network multihoming, not host multihoming in a NANOG context.  It is hard
to perceive a situation where Host Multihoming would require coordination.

Owen


--On October 24, 2005 1:31:17 PM -0700 Crist Clark
<crist.clark () globalstar com> wrote:


Stephen Sprunk wrote:
[snip]

Other people use this term in very different ways. To some people
it means using having multiple IP addresses bound to a single
network interface. To others it means multiple websites on one
server.


That is virtual hosting in a NANOG context.  Some undereducated MCSEs 
might call it multihoming, but let's not endorse that here.

Unfortunately, this is a common and "standards blessed" way to refer to
any host with multiple interfaces/addresses (real or virtual). For
example,
from the "Terminology" section, 1.1.3, of RFC1122, "Requirements for
Internet Hosts -- Communication Layers," says,

          Multihomed
               A host is said to be multihomed if it has multiple IP
               addresses.  For a discussion of multihoming, see Section
               3.3.4 below.

-- 
Crist J. Clark                               crist.clark () globalstar com
Globalstar Communications                                (408) 933-4387

The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential,
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above.
If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please contact postmaster () globalstar com



-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: