nanog mailing list archives
Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation
From: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list () nrg4u com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:43:44 +0200
Neil J. McRae wrote:
Considering that most people who are in favor of multihoming for ipv6 believe that there is customer demand for it, the market forces would decide this one.We have nobody but ourselves to blame for this. If we all ran networks that worked as well as our customers demand and didn't have our petty peering squables every full moon, the market wouldn't feel the need to have to dual home.
There is not only the multihoming issue but also the PI address issue. Even if any ISP would run his network very competently and there were no outages we would face the ISP switching issue. Again we would end up with either PI addresses announced by the ISP or BGP by the customer. With either the DFZ continues to grow. There is just no way around it. -- Andre
Current thread:
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation), (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) Jeroen Massar (Oct 24)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) John Reilly (Oct 24)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) Owen DeLong (Oct 24)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) william(at)elan.net (Oct 25)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) Stephen Sprunk (Oct 24)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) Crist Clark (Oct 24)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 24)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) Owen DeLong (Oct 24)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) John Reilly (Oct 24)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) Pekka Savola (Oct 25)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Andre Oppermann (Oct 21)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Michael . Dillon (Oct 24)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Owen DeLong (Oct 24)
- RE: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Gary E. Miller (Oct 21)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 24)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Joe Maimon (Oct 24)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Joe Abley (Oct 24)