nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () darkwing uoregon edu>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 07:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
The major problem, as has been pointed out in Privacy and RISKS digests in the past dozens of times, is that people persist in using as authenticators things (like SSN's, Mother's Maiden Name, etc) which are patently not suitable for that.
pre-existing sources of of unabigious uniqueness that map to people are hard to come by...
fwiw, most universities that I'm aware of, have moved away from using ssn's as an authentication tool.
joelja
Cheers, -- jra
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja () darkwing uoregon edu GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
Current thread:
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Jay R. Ashworth (May 25)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Michael . Dillon (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Jay R. Ashworth (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Jon Lewis (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Florian Weimer (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Bob Vaughan (May 27)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Nicole (May 31)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Stephen Sprunk (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Daniel Golding (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Edward Lewis (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Joel Jaeggli (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Adam McKenna (May 25)