nanog mailing list archives
Re: soBGP deployment
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:39:33 -0400
the certificates are carried ... in soBGP in a new BGP message.btw, am i supposed to be cheered by yet another overloading of bgp?Well gee Randy, I think you would have been happy. Here we are carrying related data in the same place.
related, but not congruent. so it is just another transport, and one which provides no advantages, e.g. security, over any other transport for the same data. randy
Current thread:
- Re: soBGP deployment, (continued)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 21)
- Re: soBGP deployment Larry J. Blunk (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Larry J. Blunk (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Steven M. Bellovin (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Tony Li (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Michael . Dillon (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Edward Lewis (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Michael . Dillon (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment william(at)elan.net (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment bmanning (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Daniel Golding (May 23)