nanog mailing list archives
Re: soBGP deployment
From: Tony Li <tony.li () tony li>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:04:04 -0700
the certificates are carried ... in soBGP in a new BGP message.btw, am i supposed to be cheered by yet another overloading of bgp?
Well gee Randy, I think you would have been happy. Here we are carrying related data in the same place. And, in the long run, the authentication information will become just as integral a piece of BGP as the NLRI are. Even you don't get to complain about data duplication and protocol "overloading" in the same day. Make up your mind. All protocols MUST have some redundancy. You want it in one place? Or more than one? Tony
Current thread:
- Re: soBGP deployment, (continued)
- Re: soBGP deployment Jeroen Massar (May 21)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 21)
- Re: soBGP deployment Larry J. Blunk (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Larry J. Blunk (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Steven M. Bellovin (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Tony Li (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Michael . Dillon (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Edward Lewis (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Michael . Dillon (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment william(at)elan.net (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment bmanning (May 23)