nanog mailing list archives
Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:42:34 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Florian Weimer wrote: > Yes, the selection of criteria could be biased. Or Telcordia compared > apples and oranges when it compared Verisign's 100 ms to DENIC's > 200 ms (or what the actual numbers where). Yeah, I was a little curious about the composition of the latency number as well... A heavily-splayed anycast deployment should have influenced that number favorably, I'd have thought, but apparently not. It's my assumption that they ran pings (of some unknown duration) from some unknown number of locations, to each of the currently-operated server addresses, and combined (averaged?) the results somehow. But I'd certainly be curious as to their actual methodology. -Bill
Current thread:
- Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Lucy E. Lynch (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Paul Vixie (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
- report of .biz outage... Edward Lewis (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Arnold Nipper (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Bill Woodcock (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 31)