nanog mailing list archives

Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure

From: Arnold Nipper <arnold () nipper de>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:55:47 +0200


On 31.03.2005 22:36 Florian Weimer wrote


Anyway, DENIC's offer didn't match that of Sentan or Verisign in many
aspects, so it's a non-issue in the end.

But only if you judge according to Telcordia's metric. As always: Nevertrust a statistic you have not faked yourself ...




Arnold
--
Arnold Nipper, AN45

Current thread:

Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Lucy E. Lynch (Mar 31)
  - Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Paul Vixie (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
  - Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 31)
    - Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
    - report of .biz outage... Edward Lewis (Mar 31)
  - Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Arnold Nipper (Mar 31)
    - Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
    - Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Bill Woodcock (Mar 31)