nanog mailing list archives

Re: ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:53:02 -0800

NO.  Operational specifications and routing are the domain of the IETF
and _NOT_ ARIN.


whoever wrote this should share what they're smoking.

Let's say DNSSEC is ready for deployment.


and cash falls from the sky

randy

Current thread:

Re: 72/8 friendly reminder, (continued)
- - - Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 24)
    - Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Jon Lewis (Mar 24)
    - Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Randy Bush (Mar 24)
    - Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Jon Lewis (Mar 24)
    - Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Joe Maimon (Mar 27)
    - Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Michael . Dillon (Mar 24)
    - ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Edward Lewis (Mar 24)
    - Re: ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Michael . Dillon (Mar 24)
    - Re: ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
    - Re: ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Edward Lewis (Mar 24)
    - Re: ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Randy Bush (Mar 24)
    - Re: ARIN, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
    - Attractive Nuisance, was Re: 72/8 friendly reminder Mike Leber (Mar 24)
- RE: 72/8 friendly reminder Hannigan, Martin (Mar 23)
  - RE: 72/8 friendly reminder Randy Bush (Mar 23)
- RE: 72/8 friendly reminder Hannigan, Martin (Mar 24)
- FW: 72/8 friendly reminder Member Services (Mar 24)
  - Message not available
    - Re: FW: 72/8 friendly reminder Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 24)