nanog mailing list archives
Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill
From: Richard Parker <richard () electrophobia com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:31:03 -0800
on 3/22/05 9:19 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
The question is is it required to be affordable? "Yes, we offer a pr0n-free internet access for a service fee of $9.95/packet".
According to the bill: (3)(b)(i) Except as provided in Subsection (3)(b)(ii), a service provider may not charge a consumer for blocking material or providing software under this section, except that a service provider may increase the cost to all subscribers to the service provider's services to recover the cost of complying with this section. (3)(b)(ii) A service provider with fewer than 7,500 subscribers may charge a consumer for providing software under Subsection (3)(a)(ii) if the charge does not exceed the service provider's cost for the software. -Richard
Current thread:
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill, (continued)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill William Allen Simpson (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Daniel Senie (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Simon Lyall (Mar 23)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Petri Helenius (Mar 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 23)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Kevin Oberman (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Rachael Treu (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Florian Weimer (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Paul G (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Rachael Treu (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Christopher Woodfield (Mar 23)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Chris Kuethe (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Will Yardley (Mar 22)