nanog mailing list archives
Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:57:00 +0100
Well, if a customer wants them to filter, essentially they (the ISP) has to do it, huh?
Providing filtering software at no additional cost is sufficient.
Current thread:
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill, (continued)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Petri Helenius (Mar 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 23)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Jared Mauch (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Kevin Oberman (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Rachael Treu (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Richard Parker (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Barry Shein (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Rachael Treu (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Florian Weimer (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Paul G (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Rachael Treu (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Christopher Woodfield (Mar 23)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Chris Kuethe (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Will Yardley (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 22)
- Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill Simon Waters (Mar 23)