nanog mailing list archives
Re: Obsolete bogon filtering
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:28:34 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Simon Lyall wrote:
1. People would have a list of phone numbers to call every time a change was made. 2. People would have a list of sites that were known to be of less clue than most. This might help them make purchasing decisions in the future.
In my experience with 69/8, most of the problem sites were "end users" rather than service providers...though in some cases, those end users were things like parts of the US Military and NASA, etc. The only provider I remember running into that had a static bogon issue was fast.net, but they don't even exist anymore AFAIK, as they were bought by USLEC. So while the list would be useful as a contact list for those affected, I doubt it's going to influence anyone's transit buying decisions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- Obsolete bogon filtering Mark Newton (Mar 09)
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Mark Newton (Mar 09)
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Rob Thomas (Mar 10)
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Simon Lyall (Mar 10)
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Mike Leber (Mar 10)
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 10)
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Michael . Dillon (Mar 11)
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 12)
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Janet Sullivan (Mar 12)
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Simon Lyall (Mar 10)
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Jon Lewis (Mar 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Joe Provo (Mar 12)
- Re: Obsolete bogon filtering Mark Newton (Mar 12)