nanog mailing list archives
Re: public accessible snmp devices?
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:18:55 +0200
Jim Popovitch wrote:
So you are saying that it's ok for a Cisco or Juniper router to return zero for a counter when they feel "busy" ?I think this could be relevant. a LOT of devices drop snmp requests when they get busy or when too many incoming requests occur. Are you sure that you were the only one polling that device? Perhaps someone else put it into a "busy" state. Too often with SNMP devices and tools a '0' can mean things other than zero.
My RFC collection tells a different story. Pete
Current thread:
- public accessible snmp devices? Vicky Rode (Mar 03)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? JC Dill (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 07)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 07)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? vijay gill (Mar 07)