nanog mailing list archives
Re: public accessible snmp devices?
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 13:24:10 +0200
Alexei Roudnev wrote:
And lately, for reasons undetermined so far there has been instances of both vendor C and J where counters suddenly go to zero either temporarily (like 1,2,3,4,0,6,7,8,0,10,etc.) or reset altogether without any reason.Hmm, good idea. I add my voice to this question. But, btw, SNMP implementations are extremely buggy. Last 2 examples from my experience (with snmpstat system): - I found Cisco which have packet countters (on interface) _decreased_ instead of _increased_ (but octet counters are _increased_);
Pete
Current thread:
- public accessible snmp devices? Vicky Rode (Mar 03)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? JC Dill (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 07)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 07)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? vijay gill (Mar 07)