nanog mailing list archives
Re: More long AS-sets announced
From: MarcoH <marcoh () marcoh net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:28:22 +0200
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:27:18AM +0100, Randy Bush wrote:
Can the people responsible for this please reconsider and put things on hold until certain conditions are met: Publish a detailed workplan including AS-es used, windows and risk analysis to the various mailinglists.given they are using their own prefixes, can you please tell us what risk there might be.
Not much, but I guess people in the audience might get happy from the small note that labtests showed IOS won't crash when it encounters these annoucements. MarcoH
Current thread:
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope, (continued)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Dave Crocker (Jun 22)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Michael . Dillon (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Dave Crocker (Jun 23)
- Re: Localized mail servers, global scope Peter Corlett (Jun 23)
- Message not available
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced brett watson (Jun 20)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Jerry Pasker (Jun 20)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced MarcoH (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Randy Bush (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced MarcoH (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Randy Bush (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Pete Templin (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Bruce Campbell (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Jon Lewis (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Tony Li (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Jon Lewis (Jun 21)