RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution

["Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: vijay gill [mailto:vgill () vijaygill com]
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 9:06 PM
> To: Hannigan, Martin
> Cc: Daniel Golding; nanog () merit edu; nanog-support () merit edu
> Subject: Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution
>
>
> Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>
> > It shouldn't be complicated. I think "members" are looking
> > for Operator experience. I don't think it's too hard to make that
> > easily discernable as long as it's fair. 
>
> Members aren't looking for Operator experience (sic). Members are 
> looking for talks that do not suck.

(sic) is a matter of interpretation, and, you already said the talks 
suck. The PC said they don't get enough talks. Some of the talks are 
going to be filler. 

-M<