nanog mailing list archives

Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution

From: vijay gill <vgill () vijaygill com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:06:18 -0400


Hannigan, Martin wrote:


It shouldn't be complicated. I think "members" are looking
for Operator experience. I don't think it's too hard to make that

easily discernable as long as it's fair.

Members aren't looking for Operator experience (sic). Members arelooking for talks that do not suck.


/vijay

Current thread:

RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Hannigan, Martin (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Steve Feldman (Jun 20)
  - Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Susan Harris (Jun 21)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution vijay gill (Jun 20)
  - Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Hannigan, Martin (Jun 20)
  - Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Tony Li (Jun 20)
    - Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Brad Knowles (Jun 20)
- RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Hannigan, Martin (Jun 20)
  - Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Steve Feldman (Jun 20)
  - RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Steve Gibbard (Jun 21)
    - Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Daniel Golding (Jun 21)