RE: Outage queries and notices (was Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area)

[Henry Linneweh <hrlinneweh () sbcglobal net>]

I did notice A low number on the index at
http://www.internettrafficreport.com/namerica.htm


-Henry

--- Joel Perez <jperez () numind net> wrote:
> [ SNIP ]
>
> > I think that these things are operational and
> belong here. Its'
> > the level that ras is talking about and the
> content. Saying 
> > MCI has a massive fiber cut impacting 230 Congress
> IX vs. 
> > GBLX is not doing what I demand are very different
> types of
> > outage posts.
>
> My original post to the list contained nothing about
> any services I
> expect with provider xxx. I asked if anybody else
> saw packet loss or
> congestion.
>
> My follow-up posts contained the reason as to why I
> was posting this to
> the list instead of to my provider, I then took it
> off-list with 2 other
> posters and managed to get more info out of them
> then out of GBLX. I try
> not to bash anybody because I know that doesn't
> really resolve anything
> most of the time.
>
>
> > I'd like to see the higher level stuff we used to
> do and have some
> > sort of information along with it vs. "i see a
> packet drop in XYZ".
> > A prefix or something. That usually makes people go
> look.
>
> I agree, it totally slipped my mind to provide that
> info. I just typed
> up a quick post and sent it out.
>
> Im my humble opinion I think this is Nanog content
> and that is why I
> posted it. Most posters opinion of what is and what
> isn't appropriate
> content varies. I love my delete key, if I don't
> think it's appropriate
> I delete it. No harm done to me. 
>
> To each his own I guess. 
>
> Thanks to those that responded.