nanog mailing list archives
Re: 192.169.0.0
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 06:03:11 +0000 (GMT)
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, W.D.McKinney wrote:
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:Perhaps someone will fix it? Where is the route leaking from TWTC in the first place? A customer or ? Apparently only 14608 sees it at route-views? Is alaska fiberstar listening tonight? a random sample of routerservers off traceroute.org shows no one else with this route...As you can see from the website http://www.alaskafiberstar.com they don't have any IP operations info available. My guess is that they out-sourced IP operations as they filed bankruptcy in 2001. figures
oh well... back to twtc to see why they are leaking this route to their customer :(
Current thread:
- 192.169.0.0 Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Jon Lewis (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 W.D.McKinney (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 03)
- Re: 192.169.0.0 Dan Riley (Jun 05)