nanog mailing list archives

Re: 192.169.0.0


From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:26:42 -0700


more grist for your mill:

route-server>sho ip route | inc 192.169
B       66.192.169.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.9, 7w0d
B    192.169.41.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 17:33:51
B    192.169.38.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 6d07h
B    192.169.4.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 2w4d
B    192.169.39.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.102, 6d16h
B    211.192.169.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.9, 2d16h
B    192.169.35.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 6d07h
B    192.169.2.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 2w4d
B    192.169.3.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 2w4d
B    192.169.40.0/23 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 17:33:58
B    192.169.36.0/23 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 6d07h
B    192.169.0.0/16 [200/0] via 168.215.52.102, 7w0d
B    192.169.32.0/22 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 6d07h
route-server>sho ip int bri
Interface                  IP-Address      OK? Method Status
Protocol
FastEthernet0/0            66.162.47.58    YES manual up
up
Loopback0                  unassigned      YES NVRAM  up
up

TWT has a route-server (from traceroute.org's listings) note the age of
this route:
B    192.169.0.0/16 [200/0] via 168.215.52.102, 7w0d

i don't get it.  this is supposed to be a good thing.

am i supposed to just announce the 200+ /8s that cover the
net, figuring anyone who has space will announce their
longer prefix?

tricky stuff sits and waits to backfire on one.  so the
older and lazier of us tend to play as close to the
straight and narrow as we can to get the job done.

randy


Current thread: