nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 22:07:59 +0300
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
We need either one efficient v6 p2p application or sites providing free p0rn only over ipv6 connections.Well, with all due respect, of *course* there isn't any 'killer site' that is v6 only yet: the only motivation to do so at the moment, given the proportion of v4 to v6 end-users, is *specifically* to drive v4 to v6 conversion at the end-user level.
The same would work for multicast. Pete
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Peter Dambier (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 codewarrior (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Sean Doran (Jul 02)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Petri Helenius (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott McGrath (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Daniel Golding (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Abley (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 John Payne (Jul 15)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 07)