nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: David Conrad <david.conrad () nominum com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 00:01:12 -0700
On Jul 6, 2005, at 10:16 PM, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
IPv6 address allocation schema is terrible (who decided to use SP dependentspaces?),
Well, to date, provider based addressing works (although there were times when it was a close thing). Your alternative?
security is terrible (who designed IPSec protocol?) and so so on.
I wouldn't say terrible. Annoying, perhaps, but security is often like that. Your alternative?
Unfortunately, it can fail only if something else will be created, which donot looks so.
The "something else" already exists, although many are unhappy about it. It has evolved a bit -- it's now called NUTSS (http:// nutss.gforge.cis.cornell.edu/)... :-)
Rgds, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 James (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Sean Doran (Jul 02)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Petri Helenius (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott McGrath (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott McGrath (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Daniel Golding (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Abley (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 John Payne (Jul 15)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Petri Helenius (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)