Re: compromized host list available

[John Payne <john () sackheads org>]

On Jul 21, 2005, at 12:35 PM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:31:13PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> ...
> > Unless I'm mistaken (and my first report hasn't arrived yet, so maybe 
> > I
> > am) this is more of a "heads up! the following addresses within your
> > network are listed on DNSBLs" than anything else.
> >
> > I can't see why you'd add a disclaimer to a report like that.
> ...
>
>
> The announcement didn't state the intended use - which, given the
> ingenuity of some, is most reasonable.  But there are those who will
> believe whatever they read, as long as it's in a report, and especially
> if the report is automatically generated.  Must be true, then, eh?  A
> report, eh?  And done by one of them infallible computer dinguses, eh?

I don't see why the reliability/reputation of a dnsbl changes the 
trueness
of "this host is listed in this dnsbl".

That is, I agree with Joe :)