nanog mailing list archives

Re: London incidents

From: Scott W Brim <swb () employees org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:08:27 -0400


On 07/12/2005 13:51 PM, Adam Rothschild allegedly wrote:

Since the vent buildings are owned operated by the
NY/NJ Port Authority, it seems conceivable they could have pulled the
power if they wanted to.  Whether or not they did is best left as an
exercise for the nanog-l army of political commentators and
counter-terrorism specialists...


Since the news this morning reported that service had been restored,
one could assume it had been turned off.

Current thread:

Re: London incidents, (continued)
- - - Re: London incidents Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Bill Stewart (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Joseph S D Yao (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidentsn David Lesher (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Jim Popovitch (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Jim Popovitch (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Michael . Dillon (Jul 13)
    - Re: London incidents Adam Rothschild (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Scott W Brim (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Todd Vierling (Jul 12)
    - "Leaky Coax" [was: London incidents] Matt Ghali (Jul 14)
    - Re: "Leaky Coax" [was: London incidents] Thomas Kernen (Jul 15)
    - RE: "Leaky Coax" [was: London incidents] Neil J. McRae (Jul 15)
    - Re: London incidents Steven J. Sobol (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Jim Popovitch (Jul 13)
    - Re: London incidents Steve Sobol (Jul 12)
    - Re: London incidents Michael . Dillon (Jul 12)
    - RE: London incidents Neil J. McRae (Jul 14)

(Thread continues...)