nanog mailing list archives

Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008


From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:13:13 -0400


In message <885D3ED1-2EE0-431B-A51A-8935E2A34081 () nominum com>, David Conrad wri
tes:

Christian,

On Jul 7, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Kuhtz, Christian wrote:
What's the problem with independent address space for every entity
(company, family, enterprise) which wants it?
It doesn't scale.  Regardless of Moore's law, there are some
fundamental physical limits that constrain technology.
Once you add that bit of reality to it, the scaling requirement goes
down substantially.  Wouldn't you agree?

My feeling is that the question isn't how much memory, but rather how  
much CPU and bandwidth is necessary to deal with routing thrash.   

That's right.  The issues are the complexity of the routing computation 
and the convergence time/stability of the routing computation as a 
whole.

                --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



Current thread: