Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article]

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

That's bad sincd DNAME is deprecated and has been removed from BIND.

Owen


--On Friday, January 14, 2005 10:05 +1100 Mark Andrews 
<Mark_Andrews () isc org> wrote:

> > What is wrong with MTAMARK?
>
>         As currently described it doesn't fit well with RFC 2317
>         style delegations.  They would need to be converted to use
>         DNAME instead of CNAME which requires all the delegating
>         servers to be upgraded to support DNAME.
>
>         There are other issues but hear is not the correct place
>         to debate them.



--
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.

Attachment: _bin
Description: