nanog mailing list archives
Re: Proper authentication model
From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:05:19 -0500
On 12 Jan 2005, at 11:53, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
You mean you'd *request* a different path from different providers.Provisioning a circuit from two different ^providers^, other than your OC3 provider.
I realise that's what you meant.My point was that competing, differently-named and organisationally-separate suppliers of network services frequently use common suppliers for metro fibre, long-haul transport, building access, etc. Just because you buy different services from different providers doesn't mean there will be no common points of failure.
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: Proper authentication model, (continued)
- Re: Proper authentication model Erik Haagsman (Jan 13)
- Re: Proper authentication model Gernot W. Schmied (Jan 16)
- Re: Proper authentication model Kevin (Jan 11)
- Re: Proper authentication model Joe Abley (Jan 11)
- Re: Proper authentication model Stephen Stuart (Jan 12)
- Re: Proper authentication model Stephen Stuart (Jan 12)
- RE: Proper authentication model Hannigan, Martin (Jan 12)
- Re: Proper authentication model Joe Abley (Jan 12)
- RE: Proper authentication model Steve Gibbard (Jan 12)
- RE: Proper authentication model Hannigan, Martin (Jan 12)
- Re: Proper authentication model Joe Abley (Jan 12)
- Re: Proper authentication model Daniel Golding (Jan 12)
- Re: Proper authentication model Michael . Dillon (Jan 13)
- Re: Proper authentication model Owen DeLong (Jan 13)
- Re: Proper authentication model Joe Abley (Jan 12)
- Re: Proper authentication model John Bittenbender (Jan 16)