nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG Changes
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:24:55 -0800
On 02/19/05, Steve Gibbard <scg () gibbard org> wrote:
I'd been waiting to hear that the nanog-futures list had actually been created before urging that this discussion move there. Since it sounds like it has been, now would probably be a good time to move the discussion.
*agree* There still needs to be a formal announcement, for those who may be interested but are ignoring this thread. I'll leave that to the current governors, though, 'cause it's not my place. -- J.D. Falk uncertainty is only a virtue <jdfalk () cybernothing org> when you don't know the answer yet
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG Changes, (continued)
- Re: NANOG Changes Paul Vixie (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG Changes William Allen Simpson (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG Changes Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG Changes Simon Lyall (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG Changes Michael . Dillon (Feb 21)
- Re: NANOG Changes Jim Popovitch (Feb 19)
- RE: NANOG Changes Steve Gibbard (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG Changes J.D. Falk (Feb 19)
- RE: NANOG Changes Michael . Dillon (Feb 21)
- Re: NANOG Changes Majdi Abbas (Feb 21)
- Re: NANOG Changes Michael . Dillon (Feb 21)
- Re: NANOG Changes Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 21)
- Re: NANOG Changes Joe Abley (Feb 21)
- Re: NANOG Changes Gadi Evron (Feb 20)
- RE: NANOG Changes Bill Nash (Feb 21)