nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Address Planning


From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:06:29 +0000 (GMT)



On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:


On 10-aug-2005, at 2:54, Randy Bush wrote:

on this side of the puddles, i think most folk use /126s for p2p
links.
this has been endlessly and loudly debated, but it still seems
extremely
strange to use 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses for a p2p link.

Well, if you want to be really environmentally conscious, do away
with that /126 too and just use link-locals, with a single global
address per router for management and the generation of ICMPs.

and you ping the customer links how? (or did I miss the point of the
link-locals?)


Current thread: