nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Address Planning
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:54:39 -1000
on this side of the puddles, i think most folk use /126s for p2p links. this has been endlessly and loudly debated, but it still seems extremely strange to use 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses for a p2p link. randy
Current thread:
- IPv6 Address Planning Cody Lerum (Aug 09)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 09)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning kawamura seiichi (Aug 09)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 09)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Alexander Koch (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Elmar K. Bins (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning sdb (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Leo Bicknell (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Alexander Koch (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 09)