nanog mailing list archives
Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () darkwing uoregon edu>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 01:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Scott Francis wrote:
On 8/3/05, Robert E. Seastrom <rs () seastrom com> wrote:Beer, unsupported assertions, and lack of rigorous audit methodology can be blended together to make one's code more secure?what unsupported assertions? The project's record speaks for itself. Don't confuse Theo's lack of social graces with a lack of polish on the project he leads (a common mistake).
You might bust out google and try and see what the oldest reference you can find to Robert Seastrom being associated with bsd development is...
Nanog-l is not someplace that we can rationally have a discussion of BSD internals or differing *BSD development/management styles.
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja () darkwing uoregon edu GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
Current thread:
- Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Michael . Dillon (Aug 03)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Robert E . Seastrom (Aug 03)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Michael . Dillon (Aug 03)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Scott Francis (Aug 04)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Joel Jaeggli (Aug 05)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Michael Loftis (Aug 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Robert Bonomi (Aug 03)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Robert E . Seastrom (Aug 03)