nanog mailing list archives

Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think


From: Scott Francis <darkuncle () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:03:11 -0500


On 8/3/05, Robert E. Seastrom <rs () seastrom com> wrote:


Michael.Dillon () btradianz com writes:

We should all be looking to the security auditing work done by
the OpenBSD team for an example of how systems can be
cleaned up, fixed, and locked down if there is a will to do so.

Beer, unsupported assertions, and lack of rigorous audit methodology
can be blended together to make one's code more secure?

what unsupported assertions? The project's record speaks for itself.
Don't confuse Theo's lack of social graces with a lack of polish on
the project he leads (a common mistake).
-- 
darkuncle@{gmail.com,darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
    encrypted email to the latter address please
    http://darkuncle.net/pubkey.asc for public key


Current thread: