nanog mailing list archives
Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden
From: Mark Newton <newton () internode com au>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:07:32 +0930
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:06:22AM +0000, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
-- Mark Newton <newton () internode com au> wrote:On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:38:00PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote: > So much for any sort of journalistic ethic, fact checking, or, unbiased > reporting. Schneier isn't a journalist or reporter; He's a security vendor.And you're a network engineer. What's your point?
Merely that Owen's expectation of "journalistic ethic, fact checking, or unbiased reporting" was misplaced because his remarks are addressing someone who has a vested interest in the outcome of the debate, not an ethical, unbiased disinterested observer. - mark -- Mark Newton Email: newton () internode com au (W) Network Engineer Email: newton () atdot dotat org (H) Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999 "Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
Current thread:
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden, (continued)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 28)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 30)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Robert M. Enger (Apr 30)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden william(at)elan.net (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Mark Newton (Apr 26)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Apr 27)
- Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden Petri Helenius (Apr 27)