nanog mailing list archives
RE: Port 25 - Blacklash
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:27:07 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Adam Jacob Muller Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 2:18 PM To: Eric Gauthier Cc: Paul Ryan; Nanog Mailing list Subject: Re: Port 25 - Blacklash The fact that most people did not complain is not likely due to the fact that they were not annoyed by the change, but rather it's easier to simply get around it than it is to bother complaining to network admins. For example, about 2 months ago, comcast decided to block outgoing port 25 from my entire neighborhood. I called comcast, and while sitting on hold I had the idea to setup a ssh tunnel to a machine at work and viola problem solved before anyone from comcast even answered the phone.
And comcast will happily allow this to be your employers problem i.e. owned, infected, or spamming. Paul was asking about ILG's and the political backlash of blocking off-campus port 25 where the ILG is using an ISP other than their school. (thanks SD, EG, MG, DD) -M<
Current thread:
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash, (continued)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Daniel Golding (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Alexei Roudnev (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Joel Jaeggli (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Joe Maimon (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Matthew S. Hallacy (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Florian Weimer (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 26)