nanog mailing list archives
Re: Port 25 - Blacklash
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:14:25 +0530
On 4/27/05, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
Of course, the same ISPs that will use the ID in the email headers are, by and large, the same ones that already know how to match the IP in the headers to their radius/tacacs/etc logs....
With a great deal less effort. When you are trying to speed up processing of this sort, the less effort wasted and less time taken nailing down one trojaned box the better -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: FW: Port 25 - Blacklash, (continued)
- Re: FW: Port 25 - Blacklash Eric Gauthier (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Adam Jacob Muller (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Hank Nussbacher (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Daniel Golding (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Alexei Roudnev (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Joel Jaeggli (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Joe Maimon (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Adam Jacob Muller (Apr 26)
- Re: FW: Port 25 - Blacklash Eric Gauthier (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Matthew S. Hallacy (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Florian Weimer (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 26)