nanog mailing list archives
Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 03:05:20 +0000 (GMT)
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Niek wrote:
On 4/9/2005 3:46 AM +0100, Nathan Ward wrote:- I was forced to use DJBs naming conventions for zonesIf you administer 2-3 domains, sure it's an hassle, if not, put code-monkeys to work. Most script people I know love the tinydns zone structure in comparison to bind's one.
because instead of MX you have . or + or - or : or something so helpfully meaningful... same for NS and A and CNAME... Yes, 1 more level of indirection is not always a good thing. -chris (not that I dislike djbdns, i just don't understand why things have to be 'different' so very much... and if bind works, why use djbdns?)
Current thread:
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND, (continued)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Chris Kuethe (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Nathan Ward (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Niek (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Niek (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND sthaug (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Simon Waters (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Tobias Reckhard (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Nathan Ward (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Chris Kuethe (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Adam McKenna (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Wouters (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND william(at)elan.net (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Apr 11)