nanog mailing list archives
Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:43:18 -1000
neither has ever had bugs or security problems, they were stopped by the flying pigs. the same pigs who made them both completely rfc-of-the-week compliant. the same pigs who made them both so easy to set up and use. as a rare truthful router vendor hack once said "we suck less." what a contenst. do you prefer emacs or vi? me? i'll take coconut. randy
Current thread:
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND, (continued)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Niek (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND sthaug (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Simon Waters (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Tobias Reckhard (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Adam McKenna (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Wouters (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND william(at)elan.net (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND william(at)elan.net (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Kevin Oberman (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND william(at)elan.net (Apr 11)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dean Anderson (Apr 11)