nanog mailing list archives

Fw: Internet email performance study


From: "aljuhani" <info () riyadmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:59:27 +0300


Hi.

Sorry there was a mistake in my previous post
the subnet listed is 218.0.0.0/8 is not yours.

thanks
aljuhani

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "aljuhani" <info () riyadmail com>
To: <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 00:53
Subject: Re: Internet email performance study


On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 23:42, Robert Beverly" <rbeverly () rbeverly net>
 
......snip
Yes, our SMTP greetings are valid and up to spec.  Again, it's the
non-deterministic loss that we're most concerned about.  If there
were a problem with the SMTP exchange, we would see our emails
always rejected (for instance).  Our measurement study only includes
emails that were successfully delivered (indicated by a complete
series of successful status codes returned during SMTP exchange).

Many thanks,

rob

Hi,

Perhaps this explains it.

http://www.albury.net.au/netstatus/derouted.html

BTW your subnet (18.0.0.0/8) is listed there as well.

Regards,

aljuhani


Current thread: