nanog mailing list archives
Fw: Internet email performance study
From: "aljuhani" <info () riyadmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:59:27 +0300
Hi. Sorry there was a mistake in my previous post the subnet listed is 218.0.0.0/8 is not yours. thanks aljuhani ----- Original Message ----- From: "aljuhani" <info () riyadmail com> To: <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 00:53 Subject: Re: Internet email performance study
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 23:42, Robert Beverly" <rbeverly () rbeverly net> ......snipYes, our SMTP greetings are valid and up to spec. Again, it's the non-deterministic loss that we're most concerned about. If there were a problem with the SMTP exchange, we would see our emails always rejected (for instance). Our measurement study only includes emails that were successfully delivered (indicated by a complete series of successful status codes returned during SMTP exchange). Many thanks, robHi, Perhaps this explains it. http://www.albury.net.au/netstatus/derouted.html BTW your subnet (18.0.0.0/8) is listed there as well. Regards, aljuhani
Current thread:
- Internet email performance study Robert Beverly (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study aljuhani (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study Robert Beverly (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study aljuhani (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study Crist Clark (Apr 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Internet email performance study Crist Clark (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study Robert Beverly (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study aljuhani (Apr 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fw: Internet email performance study aljuhani (Apr 28)