nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet email performance study
From: "aljuhani" <info () riyadmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:53:52 +0300
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 23:42, Robert Beverly" <rbeverly () rbeverly net> ......snip
Yes, our SMTP greetings are valid and up to spec. Again, it's the non-deterministic loss that we're most concerned about. If there were a problem with the SMTP exchange, we would see our emails always rejected (for instance). Our measurement study only includes emails that were successfully delivered (indicated by a complete series of successful status codes returned during SMTP exchange). Many thanks, rob
Hi, Perhaps this explains it. http://www.albury.net.au/netstatus/derouted.html BTW your subnet (18.0.0.0/8) is listed there as well. Regards, aljuhani
Current thread:
- Internet email performance study Robert Beverly (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study aljuhani (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study Robert Beverly (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study aljuhani (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study Crist Clark (Apr 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Internet email performance study Crist Clark (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study Robert Beverly (Apr 28)
- Re: Internet email performance study aljuhani (Apr 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fw: Internet email performance study aljuhani (Apr 28)