nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178
From: Robert E.Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 19:01:15 -0400
Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> writes:
What about the ccTLD prefixes? There are a lot more of them. And the gTLDs? And exchange points? And Microsoft Update servers? Where do you stop?
If you simply don't dampen (hooray for adequate CPUs), then you are not only honoring the "golden networks", you aren't setting yourself up for annoyance. ---Rob
Current thread:
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178, (continued)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Randy Bush (Sep 02)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Jared Mauch (Sep 02)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Randy Bush (Sep 02)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 02)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 John Bender (Sep 02)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Alex Bligh (Sep 04)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Bill Woodcock (Sep 04)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 02)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Bill Woodcock (Sep 04)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Petri Helenius (Sep 04)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 David Barak (Sep 04)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Robert E . Seastrom (Sep 04)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Randy Bush (Sep 02)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 03)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Rodney Joffe (Sep 03)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 04)