Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178

[Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>]

Bill Woodcock wrote:

>      On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>    > the logic seems rather irrefutable:
>    > - as a rule, shorter prefixes are more important and/or more stable
>    > than long ones
>    > - so we dampen long prefixes more aggressively
>    > - the root DNS servers tend to live in long prefixes
>    > - so we exclude the root DNS prefixes
>
> What about the ccTLD prefixes?  There are a lot more of them.  And the
> gTLDs?  And exchange points?  And Microsoft Update servers?  Where do you
> stop?
>
>  
Pay me to treat your prefixes more nicely?   1/2 :-)

Pete