nanog mailing list archives
Re: aggregation & table entries
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 14 Oct 2004 23:37:59 +0000
And what do you do with a BGP customer which sends you traffic from prefixes he doesn't want to announce to you? There are such customers.The whole point of BCP38 is that this isn't supposed to happen.
no. the whole point of BCP38 is that if this is supposed to happen, you (the upstream) should have to take explicit, non-default action which would probably include a source-address ACL, or static routes, or something. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: aggregation & table entries, (continued)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Stephen Stuart (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Michael . Dillon (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Pekka Savola (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Pekka Savola (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Patrick W Gilmore (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Paul Vixie (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Paul Vixie (Oct 15)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Paul Vixie (Oct 15)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Joe Maimon (Oct 11)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 13)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Fred Baker (Oct 13)