nanog mailing list archives
Re: aggregation & table entries
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:35:50 +0200
On 14-okt-04, at 16:41, Daniel Roesen wrote:
And what do you do with a BGP customer which sends you traffic from prefixes he doesn't want to announce to you? There are such customers.
The whole point of BCP38 is that this isn't supposed to happen.Yes, these restrictions are a huge pain in the rear end but a denial of service without even the possibility to tell where the packets come from is MUCH worse.
Current thread:
- Re: aggregation & table entries, (continued)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Stephen Stuart (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Randy Bush (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Stephen Stuart (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Randy Bush (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Stephen Stuart (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Michael . Dillon (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Pekka Savola (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Pekka Savola (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Patrick W Gilmore (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Paul Vixie (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Paul Vixie (Oct 15)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Paul Vixie (Oct 15)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)