Re: Sensible geographical addressing

[David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>]

--- Peter Corlett <abuse () cabal org uk> wrote:

> David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com> wrote:
> [...]
> > What exactly would be so bad about taking a page
> from the PSTN and
> > using a country-code-like system? There are under
> 200 countries on
> > the whole planet, so that's not a huge number of
> bits...
>
> Not that this avoids renumbering, as countries do
> occasionally split
> or merge. Sometimes there's also address space
> exhaustion within a
> country and renumbering is required.
>
> (I am reminded of a Londoner whining about "loads"
> of number changes
> since 1990. In fact, there have been just three: 01
> -> 071/081 ->
> 0171/0181 -> 020.)

But if the "country ID" bits were always in a defined
place, the pain of renumbering due to country
merge/split could be mitigated.  In any case,
countries don't split or merge THAT much.



=====
David Barak
-fully RFC 1925 compliant-


        
                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail