Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested

[Randy Bush <randy () psg com>]

> I must admint, I'm really not up on the more subtle aspects of v6
> addressing nor have I read the drafts you posted, but I've never
> understood why we needed a new set of RFC1918-like IPv6 space.

because there is not enough v6 address space?
because we like nats?
because we think we can't get space?

randy