nanog mailing list archives

Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 04:23:48 +0000

ULAs do not contribute to the global routing table unless ISPs allow them to
in violation of the draft's wording and intent.  The WG welcomes input on
how to prevent this from occurring without invoking restraint of trade
concerns.


        just like RFC 1918 space.... hum...

--bill

Current thread:

Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?], (continued)
- - - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Nov 21)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Stephen Sprunk (Nov 19)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 20)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] bmanning (Nov 20)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Stephen Sprunk (Nov 20)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 21)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Stephen Sprunk (Nov 21)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 22)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 22)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Stephen Sprunk (Nov 25)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] bmanning (Nov 26)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 27)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 27)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Nils Ketelsen (Nov 22)
    - Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Nils Ketelsen (Nov 22)
    - Frame-Relay reliability (was Re: who gets a /32) Sean Donelan (Nov 22)
    - Re: Frame-Relay reliability (was Re: who gets a /32) Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 22)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Frame-Relay reliability (was Re: who gets a /32) Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 23)
    - large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Pekka Savola (Nov 21)
    - Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] bmanning (Nov 21)
    - Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Pekka Savola (Nov 22)

(Thread continues...)