nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32)
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:34:20 -0800
--On Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:59 AM +0100 Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org> wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 08:49 +0000, Ryan O'Connell wrote:On 25/11/2004 08:07, Jeroen Massar wrote: > It is sourced from AS31459, which is the BBC R&D AS, thus might be > that it is still sort of experimental, but it is there. > > This also proves one big thing to all the people complaining about > getting a TLA. If the BBC can get it, any large organization can get > one. If you can't you simply do not network well enough. > > The BBC are probably a bad example in this case, they're more of an ISP/Content Provider than a typical Enterprise.Thus do they reach the currently only 'problem rule' that is set to get a /32? -> to have 200 sites in the future?
The rule does not require you to have 200 sites in the future. The rule requires you to have a plan to assign addresses to 200 other organizations.
The BBC is for sure one organization, with likely a couple of sites though, but 200 would seem a bit on the high side.
If they are reselling IP services, then, likely they can find 200 customers to assign address space to (or at least have a plan to do so).
If I wanted one, I could probably get one. However, that doesn't mean I haveWhat I am wondering actually, if any of the people who mention they have problems with getting an IPv6 TLA, if they even tried getting one... and if they did why did it fail? Otherwise one would not complain ;)
to agree with the current allocation/assignment policy. Owen -- If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6, (continued)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Jeff Kell (Nov 29)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Daniel Senie (Nov 29)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Wayne E. Bouchard (Nov 29)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Hank Nussbacher (Nov 30)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Jeroen Massar (Nov 30)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Daniel Senie (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI John Kristoff (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Nils Ketelsen (Nov 29)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Owen DeLong (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Fred Baker (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Owen DeLong (Nov 25)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Owen DeLong (Nov 22)
- Re: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]] Chris Kuethe (Nov 22)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 20)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 20)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Michael . Dillon (Nov 22)
- Message not available
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 22)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 22)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 22)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Elmar K. Bins (Nov 23)