nanog mailing list archives
Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ?
From: Patrick W Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 00:57:17 -0500
On Nov 5, 2004, at 12:45 AM, Petri Helenius wrote:
Netflow is based on port numbers and many run bittorrent on fairly random ports. Look at the 30%+ unidentified on the report.
Yes, but HTTP tends to run on the same port, and it only made 15.76% of bits and 18.53% of the packets.
I know P2P is "big", but is HTTP really only 16% of the bits on the 'Net?
Question is: Is this data representative of "Internet 1"? I'm thinking not, since "Iperf" was more bits than HTTP.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Deepak Jain (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Tony Li (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Marshall Eubanks (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Petri Helenius (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Marshall Eubanks (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Tony Li (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Bastiaan Spandaw (Nov 05)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Christian Kuhtz (Nov 05)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Jeroen Massar (Nov 05)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 04)
- Re: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Matthew S. Hallacy (Nov 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: BitTorrent is 35% of traffic ? Matt Ryan (Nov 05)