nanog mailing list archives

Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested


From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:55:26 -0800


If IPv6 had "local scope" addresses, then NAT would not be
necessary to prevent traffic from flowing through the
unauthorized link.

yes.  just like we see no 1918 leakage now.

randy


Current thread: