nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:52:51 +0100
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 14:46 +0000, Michael.Dillon () radianz com wrote:
and do explain how a user coming in with their laptop and dialing a provider is gonna be affected by your natIf IPv6 had "local scope" addresses, then NAT would not be necessary to prevent traffic from flowing through the unauthorized link. I know that the IETF has deprecated local scope addresses but I'm curious whether any of the router vendors currently support local scope addresses in their equipment.
"local scope" is back in the form of the ULA stuff. Which takes away the problem of local scope which was merely RFC1918. Routing vendors in general don't really care about those things. Otherwise they would have long gone been pre-configuring rfc1918 filters and other want-to-haves per default, but they don't. Remember that when there is a problem, somebody needs to be called (and thus payed) for support. NAT is a nice money business... "It doesn't work, let's call the expensive NAT guru" Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested, (continued)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Niels Bakker (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Nov 08)
- RE: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jason Frisvold (Nov 08)
- RE: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Hannigan, Martin (Nov 08)
- RE: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jerry Eyers (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested James (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Michael . Dillon (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jeroen Massar (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- RE: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Network.Security (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Adam Rothschild (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jørgen Hovland (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Paul G (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Paul Vixie (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Paul G (Nov 09)
- RE: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Ray Plzak (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Adam Rothschild (Nov 09)